Five Years on One Sentence

Also in Writers
Rimbaud Stopped Writing at Twenty
Ernaux and the Word She Won't Use

Flaubert spent five years writing Madame Bovary, reading every sentence aloud in a dedicated room until it hurt him physically to get one wrong.

The Schedule at Croisset

The house at Croisset, a former Benedictine property on a bend of the Seine just outside Rouen, was where Gustave Flaubert lived, more or less permanently, from 1844 until his death in 1880. He was not a Parisian writer in the Saint-Germain-des-Prés sense. He stayed put, he worked at night, and he reported the results — and the suffering — in letters to the poet Louise Colet, his most sustained correspondent during the years he spent on Madame Bovary between 1851 and 1856.

Those letters, collected in the Correspondance, constitute an extraordinary record of a novel being built sentence by sentence. Flaubert writes of working until three or four in the morning, of producing a single usable page in a week, of chapters that required him to rethink their architecture entirely after months of drafting. The pace was not affectation. He was genuinely incapable of moving forward until what he had was, by his own lights, finished — and finishing, for Flaubert, required the gueuloir.

What the Gueuloir Was

The word is Flaubert's own coinage, derived from gueule, French slang for the mouth. He used it to name the room at Croisset where he would stand and bellow his prose aloud, testing each sentence for rhythm, cadence and the particular kind of authority he demanded before he could set it aside. A sentence that stumbled in the reading, that forced the voice into an awkward turn or let a vowel cluster clog the pace, was a sentence that needed rewriting, regardless of whether its meaning was sound. The ear was the final judge.

What this meant in practice can be read directly in the letters to Colet. Flaubert describes physical states — exhaustion, headaches, something close to nausea — that follow bad writing sessions and a different kind of exhaustion, drained but satisfied, that follows good ones. The two registers are distinct in his prose. A week of failed sentences produces letters of almost medical complaint; a night when something finally turned correctly produces something else: a guarded exhilaration, quickly suppressed, because there was always the next sentence.

The Bibliothèque municipale de Rouen holds autograph manuscripts of Madame Bovary that make the same point visually. The surviving drafts show pages where barely a line survives the revision process, where words and whole constructions are crossed out with a violence that makes the manuscript look more like a battlefield than a fair copy. The printed novel, with its famous impersonality of surface, is the end-point of a process that was anything but impersonal.

The Novel That Arrived

Madame Bovary was serialised in the Revue de Paris in 1856, the five years of gueuloir-tested prose finally released to readers — and almost immediately to prosecutors. The charge was outrage aux bonnes mœurs, outrage to public morality, a case the state ultimately lost. What the trial inadvertently confirmed was the novel's power: a book that had been written with such attention to every syllable carried a charge that even its author's extreme fastidiousness had not defused.

Flaubert won the case and returned to his method, applying the same regime to Salammbô, to L'Éducation sentimentale, to the unfinished Bouvard et Pécuchet. The gueuloir never closed. In the letters, even late in his life, the same rhythms recur: the night sessions, the pages that refuse to move, the sentence that finally sounds right before dawn. Five years on Madame Bovary was not an aberration; it was simply the first full documentation of how he always worked.